|
print-friendly
version
We'd
Better Keep Pesticides
On
the thirtieth anniversary of the DDT ban, some reminders of why
we need to kill pests
by
Dr. Jerome Goodard
In
the last few decades, pesticide use has increasingly been scrutinized
in this country, with some segments of the population demanding
elimination of most uses of the substances. However, it is important
to realize that pesticides serve a valuable function in society
in preventing/controlling infectious diseases carried by insects
and other arthropods. They are in effect--powerful public health
tools.
Pesticides
are substances intended to prevent, destroy, or repel pests. Although
most are synthetic chemicals, some are plant derivatives, inorganic
dusts, or biological agents/products such as bacteria or their toxins.
The term "pesticide" is usually further subdivided into
more specific terms such as: fungicide (kills fungus), herbicide
(kills plants), acaricide (kills mites and ticks), avicide (kills
birds), etc.
Emerging
or Re-emerging Vector-borne Diseases
Vectors
are insects, mites, ticks, etc. that can transfer a disease agent
from one host or place to another. Accordingly, vector-borne diseases
are those carried by bugs. Many vector-borne diseases are emerging
("new" diseases) or re-emerging, including Malaria, Lyme
disease, dengue, ehrlichiosis, Rift Valley fever, and West Nile
virus. For example, malaria--the number one vector-borne disease
worldwide--continues to worsen in many areas. (See ACSH's press
release about how DDT could help fight malaria if it weren't banned.)
There are now an estimated 300-500 million cases of malaria worldwide
each year with 2-4 million deaths.
Since
1975, the mosquito-carried disease, dengue fever, has surfaced in
huge outbreaks in more than 100 countries. Some experts estimate
that there may be as many as 100 million cases of dengue each year.
It is called "break-bone fever" because you feel like
all your bones are breaking.
The
flea-transmitted disease, plague, is reemerging. A definite trend
has occurred worldwide since 1981: an increase in the annual number
of cases to nearly 3,000 per year, and an increase in the proportion
of cases reported in the African region. In the U.S., cases have
traditionally occurred out west, but lately, there has been an increasing
number of states reporting cases and an eastward movement in human
case occurrence.
The
parasitic disease, leishmaniasis, carried by sandflies, is increasing
as well. Visceral, cutaneous, and muco-cutaneous forms of the disease
occur. But perhaps the worst is muco-cutaneous wherein much of the
face erodes away, leaving the patient hideously disfigured. The
incidence of cutaneous leishmaniasis is on the rise in Central and
South America because of road building, mining, oil exploration,
deforestation, and establishment of communities adjacent to primary
forest. Once thought to be absent from the U.S., visceral leishmaniasis
may now be established here. A recent article reported more than
1,000 hunting dogs infected with the disease from twenty-one U.S.
states and Ontario, Canada.
Lyme
disease, almost unheard of in 1979, is now the number one tick-borne
disease in the U.S. with approximately 17,000 cases reported each
year. Other tick-borne diseases such as babesiosis and ehrlichiosis
are also emerging. Several new Babesia species infecting humans
have been found. Likewise, there are three Ehrlichia species in
the U.S. that produce spotted-fever like illnesses, clinically similar
to the tick-borne Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever. Others will likely
be found. All of these new or emerging infectious diseases have
raised considerable concern in the medical community about the possibility
of widespread and possibly devastating disease epidemics.
Cause
for Future Concern
Changes
in society such as population increases, ecological and environmental
changes, and especially suburbanization (building homes in tracts
of forested lands) are contributing to an increase in incidence
of many of these vector-borne diseases. It appears that we are in
a precarious situation. The entire ecosystem--including plant and
animal life on earth--is being affected by humans. People once lived
in far-removed, relatively isolated groups. Now we are all essentially
one large community. Further, things such as population increases,
building cities in/near jungles, and widespread and frequent air
travel are creating the opportunity for a great plague.
For
example, one study showed that the number of international departures
from U.S. airports doubled from 20 million to nearly 40 million
between 1983 and 1995. A person on safari in the African jungles
today might be in New York City tomorrow--maybe sitting by you at
the dentist office! What strange disease did they bring back? Should
one or more new "emerging" vector-borne diseases begin
to spread, control of the epidemic would be difficult. If the disease
agent is a virus, specific treatments are unavailable. The only
way to stop a viral vector-borne illness is to kill the vectors,
reducing them to a low enough level to interrupt virus transmission.
If the vector is a flying insect, control of an epidemic is even
harder. Compounding all of this, insect species are sometimes resistant
to many of the insecticides used to control them.
The
Need for Pesticides
Pesticides
are highly active biological compounds (but no more so than prescription
drugs, which are consumed by the millions of pounds every day).
LetÕs face it--pesticides are poisons, designed to kill things.
But the EPA registration process, requiring many years of product
testing and review, helps ensure that EPA-registered products are
safe when used according to their label directions. Millions of
dollars are invested in testing pesticide products--before they
ever reach the consumer--for their relative safety to humans and
the environment. Prospective pesticides are tested for harmful effects
to adults, children, the unborn, as well as the environment. Some
people claim that pesticides are destroying the environment and
causing widespread disease (such as cancer) in the human population.
But where is the evidence? Wildlife is rebounding after years of
decline. There are more deer and wild turkeys in the U.S. now than
at the turn of the century. Raptors are back. People are healthier
and living longer. Overall cancer incidence rates are decreasing
(although there are a few specific categories with increases, mostly
related to smoking). We must be doing something right.
Pesticides
are important public health tools. In addition, they are "environmental
medicines" to correct insect imbalances. I personally have
been in places where--for example--ticks were literally running
up my legs by the hundreds and/or mosquitoes were landing on me
at rates greater than 200 per minute. No amount of "home remedies"
or "natural control" products would have helped me in
those situations. Sometimes we need traditional, synthetic pesticides.
And we need a wide array of the products to combat any vector-borne
diseases that may arise, or any re-emergence of existing diseases.
Certainly, integrated pest management and other strategies to reduce
pesticide use are in order, but in many cases insect populations
explode and are unmanageable by non-chemical methods. We must have
pesticides readily available for use.
Not
only do we need pesticides, we need them with all kinds of labeled
(allowed) uses. Registrations for many pesticide uses are considered
"minor" by the EPA and chemical companies and thus not
much attention is paid to them. In fact, many of these potentially
useful minor uses are being dropped totally. Even though a "public
health" use may be allowed by the EPA for a particular pesticide,
the pesticide may not be available if the company decides (due to
EPA review or anti-pesticide group harassment) to quit making it.
This concerns me, and it should concern us all. We need all legitimate
pesticide registrations to remain in effect, giving us a repertoire
of weapons against insect pests.
I'm
not sure what the future holds, but I think it's safe to say that
there will continue to be increased human population numbers, plenty
of infectious diseases (both old and new), and widespread, frequent
international travel. To me, this is a combination bound to lead
to disease outbreaks. We'd better keep our pesticides.
Jerome
Goddard, Ph.D., is Clinical Assistant Professor of Preventive Medicine
at University of Mississippi Medical School in Jackson, MS.
|